It does not advance arguments, it is an impartial history of Christianity, a serious scholarly work. I would recommend that you get, perhaps if you based your criticisms on real things that the Christian church did that were bad and actually happened (unlike most atheists who use false information from unreliable sources), Christians could read what you write and actually learn from it and try not to make the same mistake.
It will do no good trying to learn from mistakes about Christian history that never actually happened (such as Christianity copying pagan ideas and being mostly derived from them).
It will do no good trying to learn from mistakes about Christian history that never actually happened (such as Christianity copying pagan ideas and being mostly derived from them).
