Ok even say Michael Behe argument falls apart. Isn't it better to try to make their argument more sensible and stronger, than nitpick on a detail of a statement. It's the over all structure of the argument that makes sense to me.
Yes Rhythm has been trying to show me how non-advantageous series of mutations can lead towards a system, but I don't see it as possible, really. I don't see how it makes sense to talk about how the final step when you get the system is advantageous, but all the way up to there, it didn't need to be, when emphasizing natural selection picks advantageous mutations like evolutionist do.
Yes Rhythm has been trying to show me how non-advantageous series of mutations can lead towards a system, but I don't see it as possible, really. I don't see how it makes sense to talk about how the final step when you get the system is advantageous, but all the way up to there, it didn't need to be, when emphasizing natural selection picks advantageous mutations like evolutionist do.
