RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
April 6, 2013 at 3:01 pm
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2013 at 3:01 pm by Mystic.)
Evolution teaches small changes over time. A designer can do significant large changes at a given moment that cannot be explained by chance. If small changes over time cannot lead from A to B, because natural selection doesn't lead from A to B, neither do mutations without natural selection given the blind watchmaker impression, you would not get from A to B.
It naturally follows, either A to B occurs all once via designer or that a designer guides mutations from A to B by a certain method (it can be that he selects the most advantageous one's to carry these mutations until the non-advantageous system turns to an advantage or he can make it something the whole population in general get's and it's massively distributed in the population over and over again or other methods).
It naturally follows, either A to B occurs all once via designer or that a designer guides mutations from A to B by a certain method (it can be that he selects the most advantageous one's to carry these mutations until the non-advantageous system turns to an advantage or he can make it something the whole population in general get's and it's massively distributed in the population over and over again or other methods).
