(April 25, 2013 at 3:23 am)bladevalant546 Wrote: I like to pose a double standard and logical issues with the "woman's body" term. Concerning this, here is a double standard first a female and unilaterally choose to keep the baby and force the father to pay for it. Even if the father does not want the child nor want to pay for it. Second a female unilaterally can abort a child against a willing father wishes. So which is it? Let use logic here, In situation A it is implying oppression to the male party to be force into an unwanted legal obligation. (and no Misandrist statements like, the dude impregnated her. Unless she was raped it was a mutual choice)
There is no misandry involved in legally requiring a man to take responsibility, even if just financially, for his creation. The alternative, leaving the mother to solely provide for the kid was a well established practice and the basis for the law. Crying oppression here is absurd. Men know what the potential consequences are.
