(April 25, 2013 at 7:29 am)bladevalant546 Wrote: 1. What makes you all different from any enitity believing world views, when in all technical (if you're intellectually honest) are merely replacing *insert enitity here* with nature.
Because not believing in a god means one must suddenly believe in nature?
Alienz, dawg.
Quote:2. In truth and honesty how do you claim objectivity when inductive reasoning use as a means to justify a full naturalist point of view?
Nobody claims this, unless they're ignorant of the word and they mean 'intersubjectivity', which they claim on faith... just like you and I do.
We're not even talking about solipsists here, just atheists, who are rarely solipsists. Faithless bastards.
Quote:3. My Final question is simple, when inductively we know things do not spring out of nothing (ex nihilio) how is taking the stance nature did still not considered faith in it most general definition?
Nothing springs from nothing, and nothing is something, therefore something comes from nothing. When there's nothing, everything springs from nothing, therefore everything comes from nothing.
Simple answer to a simple question. I'm actually not sure what your question is, because it's formulated in such a way as to be very open-ended.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
