(May 7, 2013 at 1:34 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote: And you did not even notice the incorrect information I put in what you quoted. That must be my deteriorating mind at work again.
Arpanet was originally designed to maintain contact between military forces when parts of the communication network were unavailable, aka nuked. For economic reasons the internet today does not satisfy that requirement.
I wasn't worried about the content, it was irrelevant and didn't address the point.
In case (because) you forget at your advanced age, I figured I'd explain...
You made a remark about wikipedia having "correct" info, made some age reference and relayed your thoughts on the target audience of that site. (all implying you disagreed with my statement and you're just an asshole). Then when asked to refute the facts I gave, you crumbled into a heap and babbled on about electricity, the internet, newfangled lightbulbs and other fluff.
But it wasn't the fluff or what you consider incorrect facts that bothered me, it was the fact that you repeated the fluff in triplicate, edited 4 minutes later and kept the duplicate posts. Not only does that call into question your cognitive abilities, but it also makes me wonder if you're high???
The challenge was issued and you appear to have cowered away from it. I would think a "not nice" person would jump at the chance to prove someone wrong and gloat after doing so, but you seem to be unable to even refute a high school level information website let alone a high school level encyclopedia.
So, what'll it be? Do you support your implied insults, or do you slink away. (perhaps you'll do the denial, fluff, deflection thing?)
