Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 26, 2024, 4:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God
#80
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God
(May 11, 2013 at 6:08 pm)Raven Wrote:
Code:
Godschild wrote: The tree was there so Adam and Eve could show their love for God through obedience, the same thing parents desire from their children. Tell me what would make your parents happy, your money or (not and/or) your respect for them.

That is one of the most abhorrent things I have yet to hear! My wife and I raised 4 children, 3 of whom are wives and mothers themselves. Now, like any parents, we wanted our kids to obey - but that had zero to do with their "showing their love for us" by so doing. It had to do with their staying happy, healthy and safe. If your children love you, you will know it. Every child disobeys, now and again. Does that mean they love you less? I think not. I did not always obey my folks. My love for them certainly was not going up and down like some kind of emotional sine wave. It just was. It was not conditioned on anything, anymore than my love for my kids. I just do, that's all. Further, I never would have dreamed of setting up any kind of "test" for them to see if they would obey, so they could show their love for me. The very idea is nausea inducing. Banghead

If they were not showing your their love through obedience and respect then exactly what were they doing, being selfish to stay out of harms way so they would be ok for themselves. I do not believe they did, I believe they obeyed you to stay safe for you, you raised kids so you know kids do things for reasons. They never do things just to do them, their exploring life, hopefully with the guidance of parents who love them by giving them safe boundaries. Children are looking for boundaries, that's why they will test to see where the boundaries are. I really do not believe that you do not believe children do not show love to parents through obedience.
You did not have to set up a test for your children, the world is full of them, isn't that why you gave them rules. You set these rules as you said for their staying happy, healthy and safe. Adam and Eve had no issues with safety, health or happiness, the tree was placed there so those things would be threatened through their disobedience, they did and the result is obvious.
Why would you or do you find it so hard to believe that children obey their parents out of love, what other reason do they have to obey. You say to keep them safe and ect. well they do not understand completely what they are facing, if they did they would not need rules to follow, just like Adam and Eve if there was no tree. If your children had never obeyed you do you really think you would believe they loved you? I think that's pretty doubtful.
I'm sorry your feelings got hurt, I knew what I said would be a sore point for some, but the argument for or against an evil God will and should bring the comparison of family into the picture, because the relationship of God, Adam and Eve is set as a family. I do not know if I got to everything you said, but I wanted to cover obedience and love since this was the argument coming out of the OP.

(May 12, 2013 at 1:55 am)Ryantology Wrote:
(May 12, 2013 at 1:41 am)Godschild Wrote: A child shows it's love for a parent through obedience, you do not get to choose that's the way it is. So if one does not accept their child's obedience as love what does that say about the parent. Actually I think you said the above for arguments sake.

God says that parents show their love through discipline, but Christians don't put their kids to death for misbehaving as the Bible instructs, which I am forced to conclude makes all Christians bad parents.

You're about as stupid a person as has ever lived, discipline withheld is love that's withheld, if one cares nothing for their child they'll let them experience life just as they desire, and when things go bad for the child the parent can't imagine what happened. They say nothing was withheld from the child, we let the child explore life, when actually love was withheld because discipline was withheld.
The scriptures never calls for little children to be put to death, never. You just are trying to use the same old tired statement that I've explained away thoroughly many times, grow-up.

(May 12, 2013 at 1:44 am)Maelstrom Wrote:
(May 12, 2013 at 1:41 am)Godschild Wrote: A child shows it's love for a parent through obedience, you do not get to choose that's the way it is.

Considering that there is no one correct way to raise a child, you obviously know nothing.

I did not say there was one correct way to raise a child, you are reading into my statements what you believe they say just to have an argument, but in actuality you have no good argument so you make something up, pitiful, pitiful. There are certain things all good parents do and giving rules to be followed is one of them. So you see I do know something, you're pitiiiiiful.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Darth - May 8, 2013 at 9:32 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ThomM - May 19, 2013 at 11:54 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Tonus - May 8, 2013 at 12:23 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by John V - May 8, 2013 at 12:47 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 8, 2013 at 5:45 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 9, 2013 at 2:30 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 9, 2013 at 3:07 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 9, 2013 at 4:28 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 9, 2013 at 4:51 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 9, 2013 at 5:36 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 9, 2013 at 6:07 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 9, 2013 at 10:02 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 10, 2013 at 12:31 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 10, 2013 at 5:37 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 10, 2013 at 6:32 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 10, 2013 at 9:01 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 12, 2013 at 4:27 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 12, 2013 at 1:16 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 13, 2013 at 6:47 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 11, 2013 at 11:55 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 8, 2013 at 6:54 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 8, 2013 at 7:20 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 8, 2013 at 7:40 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 8, 2013 at 8:04 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 8, 2013 at 8:24 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Drich - May 8, 2013 at 8:36 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 8, 2013 at 8:57 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by ebg - May 9, 2013 at 9:04 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Foxaèr - May 12, 2013 at 1:44 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 11, 2013 at 6:08 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Godschild - May 12, 2013 at 2:43 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Foxaèr - May 12, 2013 at 4:06 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 14, 2013 at 2:25 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 15, 2013 at 10:19 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 15, 2013 at 2:41 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 16, 2013 at 9:38 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 18, 2013 at 4:52 am
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 18, 2013 at 10:38 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 19, 2013 at 11:40 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 18, 2013 at 9:30 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by Raven - May 20, 2013 at 10:40 pm
RE: A Literal Genesis Entails An Evil God - by smax - May 22, 2013 at 5:30 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  UCKG: Church tells boy 'evil spirit' hides in him zebo-the-fat 3 524 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
Brick If everything has a purpose then evil doesn't exist zwanzig 738 44962 June 28, 2023 at 10:48 am
Last Post: emjay
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 11042 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 22566 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Free will and the necessary evil Mystical 133 17695 December 16, 2022 at 9:17 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Free will and the necessary evil Mystical 14 1697 November 11, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: Ahriman
  Armageddon. Does it make Jesus rather evil? Greatest I am 21 2316 February 9, 2021 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Christians pray evil away on the winter solstice. brewer 9 1076 December 29, 2020 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Hitler was genocidal and evil. Yahweh’s genocides are good; say Christians, Muslims & Greatest I am 25 2541 September 14, 2020 at 3:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 73498 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)