A challenge about women and marriage in Islam

[Violet]

It's ironic that you take my quote out of context as an example how how I was taking things out of context.

I don't believe in stoning people to death for adultery because I think it's barbaric and inhumane, atheism is a lack of belief in god it doesn't effect my belief in not stoning people to death. But yeh you're correct I also don't believe sharia is law from god.

You missed out the last part.

Firstly, welcome to edits (I took everything as it came into my reply box, it wasn't there at the time). I often also edit my posts within the first couple of minutes, sometimes within the full two hours. Sometimes I read them some five hours later, and wish I could edit them.

Secondly... this addition on your part is irrelevant to what rayaan said.

Muslims believe in the Shariah as a code of behavior and discipline that was divinely revealed through the Quran and the Hadiths (or the sayings of Muhammad), so that is the system that they follow. You don't believe in (^)that(^), since you're an atheist, so you can follow or agree with whatever system that you feel is correct.

Edit: added this in to save you time, which is really too kind of me.

---

Yeah, yeah keep pulling stuff out of your arse. I don't bother being coherent with internet nobodies and trolls like you, go complain to somebody who gives a shit about you concerns, because I do not.

You don't bother being coherent? Excellent, you and Paul must be buddies

If you aren't interested in discussing what you say, then why post in the first place? I mean, everyone's an 'internet nobody', and everyone 'trolls' (not that he's trolling, broski). It's a lonely world where the only one you hear is yourself.

---

Now that's just ignorant. I have fucking disease noted in there. Please take this time to reconfigure your argument.

I don't know whether or not there's some lag involved in the forum or you're just copying and pasting parts of my argument without including all of it but I actually have edited the post minutes after I posted it, you should have been able to see that, not that it makes much difference anyway.

Just to finish this off I don't have the time to read through a million paragraphs of bullshit to try and get to what point you're trying to make, I don't have the time to tell you about things that you should already know but seem to be denying.

I'm pressing reply, and replying. You'll notice how few [ hr ] lines are in my posts responding to only one person (usually: none)? That's because I hit reply (which copies your post along with whatever emphasis you decided to use). If I amend this with only a quote and an /quote removal: I will post your post as you posted your post.

If you don't read through all my paragraphs of argument, counterargument, actual data (unlike that nonsense from muslim scholar earlier), and specific bolds just so that you are assisted in finding my points: I'm inclined to believe that you don't have the time to be honest either.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cT_Ulmcrys

Honestly, not reading through the posts could look like anything, for instance: appearing to 'deny' points. It could also look like chocolate swirls. Or the runs, if you're in a hurry.

Oh? Then don't be a twat when I respectfully inform you that I intend to get to a post later

Ok stop being such an ugly lady boy, or whatever it is you are.

Firstly, when someone tells you to not be a twat, they are not telling you that you are a twat, only that you run the risk of being one.

Secondly, I should stop being a seriously sexy transexual woman with laser focus and mountains of data to back up her arguments? Why... so you can win an argument with puerile antagonism? I guess if you cannot be bothered to construct an argument... that's all you've got left.

That, and the butthurt. Fascinatingly, this isn't the first argument you've supplied only with generalizations, mischaracterizations, and incredulity... and that's just on this forum in the short time you've been here.

Edit: never mind, I apparently skipped over it Thank you for editing that post... which means that we're in agreement over that point! Hooray!