Intelligent Design, Proof III

[FallentoReason]

I'll throw 1 million coins
Most of them will fall as Head or Tail
but very few of them will fall standing on their edges (let's say 10 of them)

I'm claiming that this process is not-intelligent (and I'm right about that)

A stupid person challenged me and claimed that this process is an intelligent one.

My refutation was taking 10 coins and placing them (on purpose) on their edges; 4 of them stayed and 6 fell down (because of wind, surface, balance, etc.)

My ratio was 40% while the first process ratio was 0.00001%
My "Intelligence" was able to perform 4,000,000 times better than a non-intelligent process.

Ok, so far, so good.

Now, to the challenge
Can and Evolutionist repeat one stage of the development of one part of the body of a single animal (an Eye for example)

Seems too hard????

What about reversing the process!
Making and Ape from human


Don't you see how stupid you are?

Seems like a huge non-sequitur to me. How does claiming that evolution is very unlikely mean that we ought to try and replicate even one part of it? What the hell would that prove??

The fact is that we're here, whether we were part of 1 million coins thrown up or whether we were designed. The latter explanation requires too many mental gymanstics for my liking, so I think I'll go with the former: there are billions upon billions of stars in the universe. That means there's probably trillions upon trillions of planets out there. You can figure out the rest...