(May 26, 2013 at 6:56 am)Esquilax Wrote:To make it shourt, define intelligence and how can we know if a process is or isn't?(May 26, 2013 at 6:36 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This is totally irrelevant, the existence or non-existence of other life, doesn't mean that we came by a coincidence
If you agree with the first part, then any intelligence should be able to outperform the random (UN-intelligent) process
Can you demonstrate this, or is it just another thing you're going to assert over and over, as if that makes it true?
Quote:Replace every word I say "Random" by non-intelligent!Quote:Give an example (other than evolution) where a random process cannot be matched by our intelligence!One problem: evolution isn't a random process, and hence your comparison here, whether I can give an example or not, is flawed. Once again, you aren't even arguing the case you think you are; this entire argument has been unassailable from the outset, because it's clear you have almost no idea what you're talking about.
Quote:If you cannot then your understanding of the word intelligence is not supported by anything, while mine is supported by every thing we can see; which make it very applicable to be used on evolution as well.Quote:Because intelligence is not about just making things, it is about the efficiency in doing things.
Can you give an example of a random process that can outperform an intelligent one (for a defined, repeated target)?
And if I can't, how does that make intelligent design true? Even assuming that you understood what you're talking about, and your comparison here wasn't horribly flawed, you still have to provide evidence for your assertion; otherwise all you're proving is that we don't know everything yet.


