Intelligent Design, Proof III

[Esquilax]

To make it shourt, define intelligence and how can we know if a process is or isn't?

So, to be absolutely clear: you've voiced a contention to evolution, despite not having a clear definition of the central premise of your issue, nor any functional way to discern if it is even in play.

Out-fucking-standing.

Replace every word I say "Random" by non-intelligent!

"Scholar," I replace every word you say with the words "non-intelligent."

It saves time, and is far more accurate.

If you cannot then your understanding of the word intelligence is not supported by anything, while mine is supported by every thing we can see; which make it very applicable to be used on evolution as well.

You wanna do something other than spew word salad, fool? Like I said, you have to provide evidence for your assertion, not just objections to one alternative. So far, you haven't done anything of the sort; your claim is one made without evidence, and it's an act of extreme charity that any of us have bothered to try and correct you, rather than quite rightly telling you to shove it.

Now, do you have any evidence FOR your claim that evolution is guided by an intelligent source, or not?