False perceptions about Atheism and Agnosticism

[Simon Moon]

There seems to be a misguided perception, among Theists, about the definition of the word: Atheist, and how that term relates to Agnosticism. Many Theists feel Atheism is the denial of the existence of god, and that Agnosticism represents a completely different persepective altogether.

It isn't, and it doesn't. Atheism is simply the answer to a question:

Do you believe in god? No.

It's no more, and no less. The Atheist does not, by definition, carry some burden of proof that god doesn't exist. Further more, most Atheists are also Agnostic, as Agnostic is simply the answer to another question:

Do you know that god doesn't exist? No.

The problem with this perception is that creates many debate challenges that are either irrelevant or invalid, like for example:

"You are an Atheist, so prove that god doesn't exist?"

This question comes up frequently in debate/discussions with Theists, but the question itself misrepresents the position of Atheists. A more appropriate question in that discussion is:

"You are a Theist, so prove god exists?"

The point is, the misperception of the Atheist position is a deterrent to effective and progressive discussion between Atheists and Theists.

I'll conclude with what I feel is a perfectly appropriate quote from Stephen Roberts:

"Atheism"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."

Very nice.

I would also like to add, that for the majority of atheists, their atheism is a provisional position, not a dogmatic one.

As long as there continues to be a lack of demonstrable evidence and reasoned argument to support the claim that a god exists, my atheism will continue.