False perceptions about Atheism and Agnosticism

[Cato]

If you’re going to assert that I have never done something in this thread at least show the common courtesy to actually read all of my posts in this thread. In Post # 25 I directly quoted both the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Post # 52 I quoted a letter from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy again. Why would you reference Stanford’s article on Evidence (an article that ironically never references atheism) if you’re not going to accept their definition of atheism?

My apologies, sincerely. You had provided references.

I'll allow you a moment to bask in your glory while I lick my wounds. After, I'll demonstrate why your invocation of Flew's definition of atheism is flawed, in a Wittgensteinian way.[/i]