(June 12, 2013 at 11:03 pm)catfish Wrote: If I don't agree with your premise, your conclusion is irrelevant, (not that I agree with it anyway).
My conclusion is your objection.
You say you don't think God is just. That's the same thing as saying a just God doesn't exist.
p.s. simply asserting ~p doesn't refute my argument. Your objection is begging the question.
Quote:What would be considered "just" in a material world if we were immaterial minds?
Why is this relevant?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
