(June 27, 2013 at 3:05 am)fr0d0 Wrote: By factual you of course mean hard evidence which as explained to you at length is logically impossible. You have to use your head for that one Ryan. If, as is true in the past, you refuse to address logic, then I am wasting my time talking with you further. We have no common ground.
Without a foundation of at least some hard evidence, your logic is in no way distinguishable from naked assertion. I refuse to address your logic because doing so requires me to accept your premises on faith with no good reason to do so.
Quote:Nice dodge. Don't answer a question with another question. It's called deflection.
I can think of no reason why it would not be bad. Literally, nothing. So, the ball is in your court. You told me to ask questions.
Quote:As has been explained to you, this isn't anything to do with the subject: that an all knowing being can judge fairly.
But doesn't prove that he does judge fairly. An all-knowing being can be capricious and malicious. Knowledge does not correlate with fairness.
Quote:Your accusation rests on this being the act of a protagonist that can't know enough to judge fairly. Very simple.
God hasn't proven to me that he knows everything.