RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
July 9, 2013 at 4:36 pm
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2013 at 4:37 pm by Autumnlicious.)
(July 9, 2013 at 12:53 pm)Tonus Wrote: means that there's no paper trail, not even something as obvious as release/consent forms. There's no reason to accept that a charge this serious can be met with "nah, don't worry about it, she said it was okay."
Nothing like outright lying to make a point.
There is the implication that consent/non consent is part of their paperwork.
Here is one who didn't have the procedure:
"Jeffrey provided copies of her official prison and hospital medical files to CIR. Those records show Jeffrey rejected a tubal ligation offer during a December 2009 prenatal checkup at Heinrich's office. A medical report from Jeffrey's C-section a month later noted that she again refused a tubal ligation request made after she arrived at Madera Community Hospital."
That is a paper trail right there.
What's missing is the required oversight board sign off.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
