RE: Should Atheism proper include scepticism?
December 29, 2009 at 11:55 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2009 at 12:02 am by TruthWorthy.)
Ok, goal posts are something tangible and I can see how you could misconstrue my argument's development-in-progress. The entire point so far has been to get to the core issue at hand, the assumption of "god" and (presumably) the clues that lead to that assumption.
Simple things like "god's" location being in an imaginary place?
These issues are imaginary and hold no evidence for its own arguments point, they are just as imaginary.
Also, what is "god's" purpose, reason for being, all but inventions. For all practical reasons are easily available: Ultimately its nurturing purposes regarding death and an explanation of the beginning of time. But can you name me one argument which supports that actual existance which doesn't involve another lie's intervention? I think not.
That's why I want to address the argument for the existance of "god" while disregarding any heresay.
Simple things like "god's" location being in an imaginary place?
These issues are imaginary and hold no evidence for its own arguments point, they are just as imaginary.
Also, what is "god's" purpose, reason for being, all but inventions. For all practical reasons are easily available: Ultimately its nurturing purposes regarding death and an explanation of the beginning of time. But can you name me one argument which supports that actual existance which doesn't involve another lie's intervention? I think not.
That's why I want to address the argument for the existance of "god" while disregarding any heresay.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.
