Should Atheism proper include scepticism?

[theVOID]

This forms part of the opening argument which is being ignored.
Also, I never claimed that I would prove the non existence but would provide 'such evidence'; you've really got to learn to 'listen' . . .

I can say "god's an invisible man who follows you around and talks to you, but you can't hear him". It doesn't matter how long that statement goes for or what it was that I made up, just as long as that thing isn't tangible.
So how can we talk about the truth of the matter, considering that neither of us can have physical basis?
Easy, we talk about the argument which supports that claim (yesterday).

The reliability of any argument can be attacked as a means to defence. I'm saying that the argument of "god" can be reliably refuted through honest dialogue.
Lets speak of what we know about "god", or how we come to learn about "god". Then we'll see how many shreds reality will take out of this "god" idea!

Then show us a positive argument for the non-existence of God.