Lighter Skin = Better?

[paulpablo]

Wow Paul. You're just retarded.

Do you also crow about scoring better on 3rd grade addition than most third graders.

For civilizations such as Rome, the Mongol Empire, Egypt to rule so long with such primitive technology should be extremely impressive compared to the luxuries of successive modern times.

The world increasingly carried more and more humans.

This makes number of advancements useless as a comparison unless normalized to preceding populations, trends and ubiquity.

It took so long for humans to rise.

And yet your small odious paradigm would have you decry the very foundation all modern man intimately depends on.

You're an stupid ugly twat and you're also wrong because I was talking about civilization the computer game and saying which civilization would have scored the most if the game was reality. Everything you just said had nothing to do with what I originally posted when I said

If life was a game of civilization I think the league table would look pretty much like

If you have ever played civilization you would know it depends on who wins the most wars, takes over the most land, has the most modern technology, has the ability to go into space and so on.

For civilizations such as Rome, the Mongol Empire, Egypt to rule so long with such primitive technology should be extremely impressive compared to the luxuries of successive modern times.

Why should I be impressed with this, the technology they had wasn't primitive when they were around and actually using it.