RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
July 12, 2013 at 12:17 pm
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2013 at 12:19 pm by paulpablo.)
(July 12, 2013 at 11:45 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(July 11, 2013 at 10:01 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Everything you just said had nothing to do with what I originally posted when I said
Threads move on cock sucker.
I was taking you to the task during your inept bitchfest with Chuck.
(July 11, 2013 at 10:01 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Why should I be impressed with this, the technology they had wasn't primitive when they were around and actually using it.
By that logic, and I use the term so loosely that Statler's babble qualifies, you should never be impressed except with the current set of state powers.
After all, with Moore's Law and other similar fast rate laws of development, only the most modern and strongest economy is the "best" as per your "game" rules.
You already decided the answer to your question.
So why did you ask, you narrow minded provincial putz?
You keep talking about my rules my paradigms my narrow minded view, I said if life was like a game of civilization great Britain would probably be top of the league table, it wasn't even a serious comment (although I do think some of the things chuck said about the British empire were fairly idiotic saying they were never really all that dominant).
The game civilization wasn't invented by me it was created by sid meier. It's a pretty good game and on it you get points for taking over places, winning wars, technological advances and still being around in the year 4000, this is how the game is judged so they aren't my paradigms or my rules
I would never judge a modern civilization and compare it to a primitive one because that would just make no sense, the British empire has obviously had more people under it's power and more technological advances than Egypt or the mongols or Rome it would be no competition, but as I said my comment was made in relation to what if it was a competition and life was like the computer game Civilization.
It was basically a flippant comment with the basis being that I do think the achievements of the British empire are amazing, I don't think it's a reasonable response after I make this obviously flippant comment for people to start going mental and start typing in massively large fonts things like "EGYPT INVENTED PAPER" "PAUL YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY RETARDED" and so on.
It's like me saying " I think if life was like a command and conquer game America or china would probably win" Then people replying with "HEY YOU FUCKING RETARD EGYPT HAD A MASSIVE ARMY YOU COCK SUCKER" is it really necessary or logical?
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.