(July 12, 2013 at 8:47 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: GC, I'm sorry but everything you're doing has been responded in full in my last post. If you really are going to merely say that I haven't defined the word - a lie, as I, inresponse to you, stated that it is equivalent to "all-loving"- then you're hopeless to talk to.
In addition, when I called bullshit on your claim that "no Christian uses that term", you just fall back to hiding behind "any Christian can say whatever they want but, that does not necessitate it being true". Duh. My point was that Christians DO use it, regardless of if YOU do not.
You're the one who made the claim that Christians do use the word, now show me proof that Christians use this word. You have not thus far given any proof of anything you have stated period, you have failed on all accounts. you're a childish person that doesn't want to admit your wrong, If scripture does not call God benevolent then why do you believe you can use omnibenevolent to describe God?
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
