RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
July 14, 2013 at 6:08 pm
(This post was last modified: July 14, 2013 at 6:18 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(July 13, 2013 at 12:48 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:(July 13, 2013 at 12:24 pm)Chas Wrote: That's whacked. How is having a favored environment racist?
I think it's the book the posits that whites 'evolved' in environments suitable for pack animals, and thus it put them in a higher position.
It says nothing about "higher" position. What it says is the shape of Euroasia (Very long in the east - west direction) ensured there were a few very large zones of similar climate, pastoral and agriculture zones, which made it more conducive for commerce in material, ideas, technological advancements, and transmission in resistence to disease then other large land areas like Africa and America, which are long in the North-South direction but short in East-west direction, and thus segregated into numerous different comparative small, incompatible climate, pastoral and agricultural zone.
Also the geology of Euroasia supplies critical raw material for technological advancement where other places, like Australia and South America, didn't.
(July 14, 2013 at 4:31 pm)cratehorus Wrote:(July 13, 2013 at 12:24 pm)Chas Wrote: That's whacked. How is having a favored environment racist?
"having" a different enviroment isn't racist stating europeans are "better" human beings and here's why or answering "why are europeans better people" with a detailed analysis and an attempt in sound reasoning is.........many conservative writers even admit enviromental determism is very racist
.........again white people have tiny penises and have too fight and kill all other races because of this....... they are by far not peace loving........ if i killed everyone in my neighborhood and stole all their stuff am i more civilized? because of that act? no........ so why are white people?....... they are the most murderous degenerate race to ever exist
Fuck you. The book asked Europeans had guns, Africans and American Indians didn't. Why?
You can associate guns with "better racially", but that's your problem. He simply associated guns with "better conquest wise", which you would be more idiotic than the most moronic of nincompoop to deny.
What they had was better tools over all, which including those that can be used to murder. If you think better tools overall makes you degenerate, then may you become extinct and the rest of the world become even more degenerate.
BTW, It is hard to argue the Europeans were more murderous than other races. When confronted with the opportunity and means to kill someone to gain one's own ends, hardly can it be argued that other race would have dived into it with any less relish and lust than Europeans.
It's only when inferior tools caused them to become more the murderee than the murderer in a contest of mutural murder, that they squeaked about how much less humane the Europeans were. If the shoe was on the other foot, Europeans would undoubtedly squeal like rats just like the others, and the others would pontificate about how not only were they superior, but they deserved to be so.