Punished for Babel?

[fr0d0]

I said : there cannot be proof

You said : there is no proof

Claim = yours.

There is no proof. Simple as that. The burden always lies with the one making the positive, extraordinary claim for which there is no evidence to support the claim.

And again you start with the semantics. There cannot be proof and there is no proof are the same thing. If you had stated there is currently no proof, that would have been different.

But I make no claim. I state that there cannot ever be proof. The claim is of your imagining.

That's not semantics. I'm being very clear.

And so are you. You think proof is possible, and the reason for your disbelief is the lack of it. So you must have an idea of what that proof is, or your objection must be illogical, or based on blind faith.