Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 20, 2026, 12:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument?
#39
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument?
(January 1, 2010 at 1:33 am)TruthWorthy Wrote: Ok, the proposition (or supposition) of "god exists" doesn't fit into any of the criteria of theory evaluation listed here:

Empirical validity
Parsimony
Comprehensiveness
Internal consistency
Testability
Usefulness
Acceptability
(Liebert, M., Spiegler, M., 1994., On making scientific theoretical construct evaluations Personality: themes and perspectives(7th Ed.). Brooks/Cole: USA)
For the last time:

"God exists" is a statement (proposition) in logic.
"God exists" is not a scientific statement.
"God exists" is not a scientific theory.

Why you expect a statement that isn't scientific to adhere to criteria on scientific theoretical construct evaluations is completely beyond me.

It's like saying a "cat" cannot exist because it doesn't adhere to the rigorous standards of building regulations. Absurd.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 10:03 am
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 5:37 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 9:22 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 10:03 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 10:23 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 10:17 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 10:44 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 11:03 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 11:20 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 11:33 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by theVOID - December 31, 2009 at 11:01 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 11:09 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by fr0d0 - December 31, 2009 at 11:16 pm
RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument? - by Tiberius - January 1, 2010 at 5:34 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If god exists, isnt humans porn to him? Woah0 7 2872 November 26, 2022 at 1:28 am
Last Post: UniversesBoss
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 15839 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  How to destroy any argument for God Drich 46 12830 October 9, 2019 at 9:02 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  How To Support Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 0 944 August 26, 2019 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How To Easily Defend Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 5 1807 August 22, 2019 at 9:13 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Every Apologetic Argument Ever YahwehIsTheWay 21 6229 December 1, 2018 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: T0 Th3 M4X
  Argument from pompousness? Fake Messiah 8 2134 September 1, 2018 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The witness argument (yet again, I know, I know) Mystic 81 27798 August 19, 2018 at 10:43 am
Last Post: Jackie
  Very short argument for God (another clear proof) Mystic 123 45449 January 26, 2018 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Another argument for God. Mystic 52 17834 January 24, 2018 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: uncool



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)