RE: "god exists" <Why is this a relevant argument?
January 1, 2010 at 6:54 am
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2010 at 6:56 am by TruthWorthy.)
Thanks Rabbit (If it's ok for me to use that for short),
The outlook of Theological noncognitivism is very good.
I looked it up earlier today because I'd never heard of it, and I have to agree with it for the most part; only I can't justify refusing to accept everything because of lack of provability, that's where I think it goes too far.
Adrian,
Then why did you use that argument in my other thread so arrogantly? with your "God exists and you can't prove it!"? It was you who gave me the impression that the statement: "god exists" is a theory which needs to be disproved.
So . . . . put that in your _____ and _____ it.
The outlook of Theological noncognitivism is very good.
I looked it up earlier today because I'd never heard of it, and I have to agree with it for the most part; only I can't justify refusing to accept everything because of lack of provability, that's where I think it goes too far.
Adrian,
Then why did you use that argument in my other thread so arrogantly? with your "God exists and you can't prove it!"? It was you who gave me the impression that the statement: "god exists" is a theory which needs to be disproved.
So . . . . put that in your _____ and _____ it.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.
