(July 18, 2013 at 7:58 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:I was saying that you, personally, have not given me a reason. (Suggesting that you've had opportunity through our correspondence and have not done so). I was not saying I would reject anything that comes from you. Only that you could not give me any reason (when asked earlier) nothing more.(July 18, 2013 at 7:18 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: I haven't ruled it out (1). I've given you the criteria that a claim must meet to be credible (2)
So you think that this truth is a product of God? (3)
1. Why did you say that I couldn't give you any reason then??
2. Please remind me of the criteria
3. I have no idea what you're asking.
2. Discernible from non-existance, correlates with my experience of reality, can be verified by myself and others does not stem from unreliable processes, and is just as vulnerable at being falsified as it is to being confirmed.
3. For you to explain why you think the absolute true-ness characteristic of the sum of 2+2 is a characteristic of God or if that is what you were saying. I was asking for clarification.