RE: My views on gay mariage
July 20, 2013 at 5:37 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2013 at 5:38 am by kılıç_mehmet.)
Quote:Keep talking mate. You're so ignorant it's actually quite astounding.I'd say you sound rather arrogant.
Quote:Lets all play the 'judge people based on factors they have no control over [skin colour, race, sexuality]' like the archaic bigots we areWell why really then identify with something that you have no control over? Heterosexuals don't go around making pride parades.
Homosexuals do, so that means that they wish us to judge them on that accord. And they publicize themselves on their sexual identity, so that means I have no other choice but to judge them on the said identity they have picked for themselves.
Quote: I'm not covering my eyes or shutting my ears to silliness, I've heard it all before from bigots who are carbon copies of you.And you think that you're the only liberal/leftist I've spent my time on?
Quote: It's great because you do more to further the cause of basic human equality than any argument ever could. So keep up the good work! We're all rooting for you.I think that there is the cause of basic human inequality, so I personally do not dwell on the equality that doesn't exist. I generally try to be above others as being equal with someone doesn't earn me or my nation anything.
Quote:I'm not a liberal, I'm a fiscal conservative, a pragmatist and an egalitarian. So shall we chalk up your incorrect analysis of my political/social views to yet more ignorance on your part?Meaning, you're liberal. Leftist and internationalist in every way.
It doesn't really matter what your economic viewpoints are, your ideals are the same as the others.
(July 20, 2013 at 5:27 am)Maelstrom Wrote:Bah, religion? In my country, all marriages are conducted by civil servants, what kind of a monopoly does religion have here on marriage?(July 20, 2013 at 5:21 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Marriage has been invented for and by heterosexuals.
Religion does not have a monopoly on marriage, and for that reason the definition of marriage has evolved as mankind evolved through the ages. You seem to be stuck on the heterosexual track, and it will get you absolutely nowhere except toward idiotville. If there is one thing mankind learns, it is that societal situations must evolve as man's mind evolves. Otherwise, the society that does not change gets stuck in a backwards environment while the rest of the world progresses.
I'm stuck on the heterosexual track because thats the only track that allows for the generation of new generations. For those who prefer the "other tracks", their lineage ends with their lives.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?