RE: My views on gay mariage
July 20, 2013 at 6:05 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2013 at 6:07 am by pineapplebunnybounce.)
(July 20, 2013 at 5:54 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:So much stupidity in a 3 sentences. Cheating to have children? HAH. heteros have been doing it longer than homos have. Who gives a shit if you're siblings by blood or not? For the rest of us who actually care about the children, as long as they're raised well and raised happy, why does it matter if they share DNA? If you want to go on this track you have to say that you think adopted children are of less value in society than biological children. I fail to see the point of the family name argument. Why not just play a game and whoever wins gets to pass on their last name? What impact does that have on the child anyway?(July 20, 2013 at 5:45 am)Maelstrom Wrote: Wrong. The family dynamic is diverse, and same-sex couples are perfectly capable of having children, either through adoption or surrogacy, in order to continue the family name into the next generation.
Well, their capability is tied to the heterosexual reproduction system though, like they cheat to have children, and even in that case, which of the "fathers" will it be, really? Say that two gays had used two different surrogate mothers to produce two children. Those two children aren't even siblings by blood, and there is also the matter of whose family name will be continued, indeed.
Quote:I think this whole thing is a bloody joke, mate, but it kinda starts to sound more and more like Huxley's A brave new world.I hope you're a joke.
Quote:If they be so vain, they can go and marry women and have children of their own, and many do so, as a matter of fact. They reject the said lifestyle in order to be in harmony with the public. That is a person I admire, that sacrifices his own petty pleasures to become a part of regular, upstanding society.Shame on you for expecting people to suffer because oh it makes you uncomfortable.