RE: agnostic atheism is oxymoronic
July 20, 2013 at 6:07 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2013 at 6:09 am by MikeTheInfidel.)
(July 20, 2013 at 4:40 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(July 20, 2013 at 3:32 am)MikeTheInfidel Wrote: Unless of course we're talking about the interventionist God of Abrahamic theism and other theisms, in which case proof would absolutely be expected. And any deity which doesn't intervene is irrelevant.
fail
Show me how anyone ever would have transferable proof. It just is never possible. Never was and never will be.
You've got to be joking. The Abrahamic god was a deity who, throughout the Bible, manifested himself physically in several forms, spoke directly to people, acted directly in nature, and so on. If this god exists, the evidence for him will be empirical. In fact, if the Christian part of the Bible is true, then every single human being who ever lived will meet this god in person at the second coming.
And as for other gods? Every time someone claims that a god did something physical in the world, that's an event that would leave evidence. Some gods even supposedly created magical artifacts for humans to use.