(July 20, 2013 at 9:33 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You're letting your imagination run wild. Even if those stories are true, don't you think that there could be valid scientific explanations? Just last week I was watching some program detailing the circumstances that might make the Sea passable on foot at that point. Tidal flow/ tsunami elsewhere/a shallow pass there anyway.
It's entirely down to interpretation. They said God did it.
God directed me to this forum the exact time you posted. If I'm distracted or my phone crashes and I can't reply, that's what God wanted. That's how I see it. That's how they saw it. Do you see?
(July 20, 2013 at 8:01 am)Chas Wrote: You do not understand what is meant by evidence. All evidence is, by definition, transferable.
You must be talking about feelings or revelations. Those are not evidence.
So you've never heard scientists use the term empirical in relation to evidence?
Really? You're really going to go there? You're really going to try to play word games?
Empirical evidence is the result of observation and experiment. Other evidence may consist of concordance with theory that is otherwise supported by empirical evidence.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
