(July 23, 2013 at 9:44 am)Rhythm Wrote: That is en entirely falsifiable (and conveniently, falsified) hypothesis. If your intent was to create something that could not be disproven, you failed - for all of the reasons enumerated upon -the first moment you proposed it- in the jokethread associated.I did not post it in a Joke thread. I first posted it on AF.com and then in the Appologetics potion of CF.com and then 2 or 3 times here.
Quote:Though, as an attempt to reconcile science with faith it was admirable- as it -did- stick to the rules of the system. Sadly, that's why it is a falsifiable hypothesis. Nothing that "cannot be disproven" can reconcile the two systems. Fundamental fail.
So because the post meets the parameters of the challenge, it is automatically disqualified? Sounds as if your line of reasoning is what is flawed.
