This argument is silly. The attributes of "god" has always been made intentionally slippery and laced with double speak so domineering theists can shift it to cower the gullible whenever they feel the urge, and defensive theists can slide the goal post whenever their apologetics open them to too much ridicule.
You can argue against any appearently interpretation of what theists say about their god, and tomorrow the theists will change the interpretation so as to lead you on another goose chase.
You can argue against any appearently interpretation of what theists say about their god, and tomorrow the theists will change the interpretation so as to lead you on another goose chase.