(July 29, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Koolay Wrote: You understand historically, the government set up the legal apparatus to trade and own slaves, and also offer incentive to those to own or return slaves back to their master. The less than scrupulous private land owners that traded in flesh, was all made possible by the state's enforcement.what is government? if i pull a gun and rape your wife am i not the governor???????? you seem to confuse democracy with government
Quote:In a free society that would violate the the non aggression principle, you are aggressing against someone and are subject to the consequences that comes with that.what the fuck are on about???????????
Quote:Not to mention, owning slaves is incredibly under productive. A) All the slaves resent you and your employees. B) They will only do what is necessary to not be whipped, half assed job. C) They require constant supervision and management, since they have zero incentive other than avoiding the whip. D) You need to pay for their shelter and food, and water. This came at a huge bill for slave owners,the lynch family ripped the limbs by horse from the strongest of the males of a new crop of slaves too justify their dominancy amongst the rest of slaves so what the fuck r u talkin about
Quote:it is much more profitable if you do the morally correct thing and employ someone voluntary, since they will self manage, pay for their own food and shelter, don't resent you, have a vested incentive to a good job and make sure your company does not fail.no it is much more profitable if enslave people and force them too work for cornmeal
Quote:Only a mad man would want a team of slaves rather than voluntary workers.no slaves work under threat of death ..............volunteers can leave whenever the flying fuck they want
[/quote]