RE: Here is a interesting thought
July 31, 2013 at 11:52 pm
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2013 at 12:13 am by Michael Schubert.)
(July 31, 2013 at 8:24 am)Drich Wrote: That is the beautiful thing about that theory. Evolution can say what ever it wants to say, and it will still fit with in the confines of a literal biblical creation account.
No, the literal biblical creation account is not based on any primary research. The ancient writers made the creation account entirely up from the top of their heads. They did not witness God creating anything. There is nothing at all scientific about creationism.
Honestly, what do you know about evolution?
(July 31, 2013 at 8:24 am)Drich Wrote: Actually it does not. The Genesis account only give a 'creation pov' from the perspective of the Eden Nothing outside the Garden is meantioned to any great detail. Again my theory say evolution could have taken any course as currently understand it, and that does not change what happened in the garden. For nothing in the evolution account of orgins can account for what happened in Eden.
Quote:Paleontologists and scientists dug up fossils dating back to millions of years, analyzed them and assembled them into family trees based on their similar biological traits. The youngest fossils were buried higher up in the earth, and the older fossils were buried deeper down in the earth.So?
Maybe you should read (not skim) what I wrote in my creation/evolution thread again. There is no legitimate 'evolution' arguement that can not be assimliated by the creation account.
Quote:Vegetation was also created by humans during the Agricultural Revolution (not by God), which continues to this day.Humans do not create they produce.
God Created Adam. Meaning He took essentially nothing and made Man.
From Adam God Produced Eve. Meaning He took apart of something that was existing and made something like the orginal. (This is what man does)
The "creation account" of Genesis states God created man out of dust, and Eve out of Adam's rib. You honestly believe that? It is biologically impossible to create a human woman out of a rib. It is also biologically impossible for a virgin woman to give birth to a child. You're probably saying "well, God is all knowing, so only God can do something like that". You can't prove God exists. Human beings (homo sapiens) evolved from Australopithecines, Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus; they were not created by God in the beginning the way they look today. It also says God created vegetation over the course of six days. Well, it also says humans tended to the vegetation right away, when in fact people didn't start "producing" vegetation until the Ag revolution, which continues to this day.
The theory of evolution is the antithesis of Genesis's creation account.
(July 31, 2013 at 8:24 am)Drich Wrote: Again my theory say evolution could have taken any course as currently understand it, and that does not change what happened in the garden. For nothing in the evolution account of orgins can account for what happened in Eden.
So, where is your evidence that Genesis is not just a made-up fantasy story?
