Here is a interesting thought

[Michael Schubert]

So you do have 'proof' to back this statement as worded do you not? or is this what faith based belief looks like in your life?

There is nothing at all scientific about creationism.

How could you possiably know. One of Science's key principles is observation. Without it, it becomes a buch of egg head guessing or playing a game of "what if."

Honestly, what do you know about evolution?

I know/knew enough to shut down the last evolution thread that stated the the stegasaurous was evidence or proof that creation was not possiable. I think just about all the regulars rang in on that one.

Red Herring. The subject being discussed is about man's ablity to create from nothing.

Yes, science's key principle is observation, and there is no evidence to date of an organism that was created by an intelligent mind. All gods are accepted on faith. Creationism says a diety jumped out of nowhere and POOF it all appeared, which is unscientific and ludicrous. Science cannot prove anything about the supernatural, and creationism (like Scientology) is a global scam.

In regards to a human's ability to create from nothing, yes, humans cannot create anything from nothing. But it sounds like you are making that same fallacious argument the creationists make: You say "this looks like creation, therefore it had to have a creator." We look at something like a painting, and we know through evidence that it was created by an intelligent mind. We look at a tree or a plant, and we know through evidence that they are naturally occurring.

The stegosaurus is evidence that creation is not possible? That is very abstruse. There is no evidence that any dinosaur was created by an intelligent mind. All the dinosaurs evolved, just like Homo Sapiens did.