(August 6, 2013 at 12:35 am)bennyboy Wrote:(August 5, 2013 at 9:08 pm)Koolay Wrote: No, where did you get that from?It's a conditional threat-- I own a gun just for decoration, unless you do something that angers me enough. But since in your perfect world there is no government, I'm also free to decide, totally arbitrarily, what does/does not constitute a "not aggressive" bullet through the brain. Dude, your red shirt reminds me of my mother's blood as she died in that train crash-- so I get to shoot you, and you were the aggressor. Dude, you like Bud Light, and not normal Budweiser? You have instigated a shooting offense. See how that works? With no government, decisions are arbitrary. And most people are too fucking retarded to be allowed the privilege about making decisions about who needs to live or die.
I am against violations of the non aggression principle. Owning weapons does not violate NAP.
Your ideas are as full of holes as Trayvon Martin's body-- which, since I now know you're a Tea Party nut, I'm sure you see as the result of a non-aggressive use, by a concerned citizen exercising his right to protect himself without government intervention.
Thank you. A delusion is a delusion and mental masturbation never works because there is no such thing as a utopia. People can be greedy and that is the part this utopia nut doesn't get. You put too much power in the hands of ANYTHING and it can and will step on others. No government would simply be one rich family or rich group dictating to everyone else.
If that idiot wants to see what no government looks like Somalia would be a great place for him to live. What they have is nothing but rich warlords.
