(August 10, 2013 at 10:06 am)Stimbo Wrote:(August 10, 2013 at 9:56 am)Theo Zacharias Wrote: The purpose of my post is to show that it's not that easy. Do you agree that it's easy? If you do, could you please tell us just one phenomenon that, if observed and valid, will prove the existence of God? Or you agree that it's not that easy?
You want atheists to come up with something to prove your god and then discuss whether or not we'd consider it as valid proof?
Seriously? Please tell me you didn't say that with a straight face!
I see no reason or argument on your post, i.e. why it's wrong if someone expects that? For me both theist and atheist should do that. Both theist and atheist (and also agnostic) should seek the evidence for God existence/non-existence and also should seek any reasons to belief or disbelief in God.
I'm sorry, I'm not interesting in dogmatic position like the burden proof is *only* and *always* on theist (without saying what's the reason). To me the burden proof is to both (who claims to know something).
I'm also not interested in the "default disbelief position" (without saying what's the reason). To me there is no default position (other than maybe apatheism). If you choose to be a rational theist, you should have a reason. Same goes for a rational atheist. I already told my reason in my previous post. What's the reason for atheist?
I'm sorry, I won't response to any post unless the post is supported with argument/reason. I'm not interested in dogmatic position.
