Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?

[Locke]

And also @Captain Colostomy:

I agree that atheists are not amoral as I said multiple times.. I also do believe that atheists ARE moral, so nobody's insulting you. And yet atheism itself is an ideology that is amoral, yet begs that morals are essential. It states these morals are relative to the society, but every society that embraces these relative morals without a God concept devolves towards the stone age. That, to me, is evidence of its failure. It contradicts itself on its most fundamental levels, and yet time and time again when I let atheists know my reasons for not following it they get angry and bash me for attacking them, using unscientific and illogical arguments, condemning them to hell, and a myriad of other things I am not arguing.

Everything I'm saying right now was covered in my last post, so it seems to me you both replied without understanding my last post. Please make sure you understanf what I was saying.

Atheism isn't an ideology. Why are you insisting this? Most of your post is using this assumption. And 'back to the stone age....really? What godless group has devolved into cave men by lack of morals?

You are a Christian shill.

Ideology: 1 : visionary theorizing 2 a : a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture b : a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture c : the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program.

A lot of godless groups, actually. I already gave examples, feel free to read up

EDIT: They haven't gone back to the stone age, that was an exagerration. However, they all go backwards - it has proven to be counterproductive to the advancement of human society