Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?

[FallentoReason]

No, not really. So what?

ALTER2EGO -to- FALLEN TO REASON:
This may come to you as a shock, but your skepticism expressed as "So what?" indicates you have no effective rebuttal.

Let me exchange my "so what" with this:

Meh.

Scientists wouldn't be able to predict things if the periodic table wasn't tidy.... *meh*.... so what?? So what if they couldn't predict things otherwise? What's so amazing here??

This "precise" law could be said to be the result of *random* causal relations since the Big Bang which led to *this* universe and not some other variation. Any other variation would of had its own equally "precise" law due to a different set of causal relations.

You're pointing out a trivial fact about causality. So what? Tacking a deity at the end of said trivial fact is a non-sequitur.

See what I'm saying? Another "So what?" as if somehow, you can wish reality away by not wanting to deal with uncomfortable facts.


I will address the remainder of your post at another time.

Errr.. yeah.. how about you respond to my point properly? Read the stuff *before* and *after* the "so what" - the meat of my point. You've brushed off my point about you simply pointing to the trivial effects of causal relations from the big bang that we observe today. That's why I ask "so what"? Again, what is there to see here? What do you want me to get out of this? You're coming short on any sort of meaningful explanation for your theory, hence me shrugging and being left with nothing to say but "so what"?