Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 6:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
#1
On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
Not sure how many here know about or know someone who was affected by the "recovered memories" movement in psychotherapy.  One of my wife's younger sisters attended a recovered memories group in researching a book she wanted to write.  In the course of doing so she became convinced she'd been the victim of sexual abuse.  At first she didn't know by whom but over time she decided it had been her father and that her mother was an "enabler".  My wife Lia and I responded at first believing there must be something to it.  But when Lia would not concede that she too had been a victim the sister cut us and her parents out of her and her family's lives.  When Lia's mother died she sent a card to her father expressing the wish that this be a time of remembering.  Both of their parents died being shunned by this daughter and Lia's younger sister (who also underwent recovered memories therapy at the urging of the middle sister).  This has happened in many families.

I find it remarkable that the psychotherapy community allows such practices to continue when they are so destructive and have no therapeutic value.  A person with real symptoms comes in and essentially loses part of their familial support system.  No study has ever shown that hypnosis or guided imagining to probe traumatic memories has any therapeutic value.  More often 'patients' become worse and become angry, withdrawn and ever more drawn to the therapist.  It is a pretty stunningly horrible phenomenon to discover when it does strike someone you know.

This Ted talk video by a respected psychological researcher investigates the nature of memory, specifically the conditions under which false memories can be planted.  I think it is useful for those of us skeptically inclined to know to how fragile memory really is.  We all know that theist testimonials aren't worth a lot.  Turns out that all first hand witnesses should be looked at with equal skepticism.  It always requires corroborating evidence to be of any value.


https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loft...=tedspread
Reply
#2
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
(August 29, 2016 at 11:39 am)Whateverist Wrote: Not sure how many here know about or know someone who was affected by the "recovered memories" movement in psychotherapy.  One of my wife's younger sisters attended a recovered memories group in researching a book she wanted to write.  In the course of doing so she became convinced she'd been the victim of sexual abuse.  At first she didn't know by whom but over time she decided it had been her father and that her mother was an "enabler".  My wife Lia and I responded at first believing there must be something to it.  But when Lia would not concede that she too had been a victim the sister cut us and her parents out of her and her family's lives.  When Lia's mother died she sent a card to her father expressing the wish that this be a time of remembering.  Both of their parents died being shunned by this daughter and Lia's younger sister (who also underwent recovered memories therapy at the urging of the middle sister).  This has happened in many families.

I find it remarkable that the psychotherapy community allows such practices to continue when they are so destructive and have no therapeutic value.  A person with real symptoms comes in and essentially loses part of their familial support system.  No study has ever shown that hypnosis or guided imagining to probe traumatic memories has any therapeutic value.  More often 'patients' become worse and become angry, withdrawn and ever more drawn to the therapist.  It is a pretty stunningly horrible phenomenon to discover when it does strike someone you know.

This Ted talk video by a respected psychological researcher investigates the nature of memory, specifically the conditions under which false memories can be planted.  I think it is useful for those of us skeptically inclined to know to how fragile memory really is.  We all know that theist testimonials aren't worth a lot.  Turns out that all first hand witnesses should be looked at with equal skepticism.  It always requires corroborating evidence to be of any value.


https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loft...=tedspread

Fuckin'... God.
Jesuusssss!
Praise the Lord as these fools throw their bodies on the floor!

I honestly don't know what to say but I think people like this just want pure attention to boost their ego.

Reply
#3
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
(August 29, 2016 at 11:45 am)ScienceAf Wrote: Fuckin'... God.
Jesuusssss!
Praise the Lord as these fools throw their bodies on the floor!

I honestly don't know what to say but I think people like this just want pure attention to boost their ego.

That probably does feed into it. This middle sister has always told stories in which she is the hero saving someone from something. Now she is trying to save the future from satanic rituals. So very weird.
Reply
#4
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
(August 29, 2016 at 11:49 am)Whateverist Wrote:
(August 29, 2016 at 11:45 am)ScienceAf Wrote: Fuckin'... God.
Jesuusssss!
Praise the Lord as these fools throw their bodies on the floor!

I honestly don't know what to say but I think people like this just want pure attention to boost their ego.

That probably does feed into it.  This middle sister has always told stories in which she is the hero saving someone from something.  Now she is trying to save the future from satanic rituals.  So very weird.

People also make themselves victims to get appraised and noticed.

Reply
#5
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
If I recall correctly, my own memory is quite faulty. Or is it?
Reply
#6
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
It is the people who believe memory is infallible you've got to watch out for.
Reply
#7
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
What was the OP about, again?

Reply
#8
RE: On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory.
(August 29, 2016 at 3:52 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: What was the OP about, again?

This lady and others have done some well respected research into the way false memories can be implanted.  When you combine that with people's naive assumption that memory is like a video recording, in there somewhere recorded with perfect fidelity, you can get bad results if those assumptions are reflected in the legal system.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Nature was able to understand what we need. RayOfLight 30 3449 October 14, 2017 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Sleep patterns. Nature or Nurture? ignoramus 19 1940 July 6, 2016 at 4:19 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Relation Between Memory and Intelligence? Rhondazvous 13 3466 December 15, 2015 at 11:30 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  A Question About Memory Jenny A 25 3137 October 8, 2015 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: KUSA
  Memory IATIA 3 1108 March 22, 2015 at 1:52 pm
Last Post: Cato
  Nature: Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Dolorian 10 4031 October 12, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas
  Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents? Alter2Ego 20 8160 August 13, 2013 at 9:48 am
Last Post: Something completely different
  Ministry of Memory Distortions pocaracas 1 1942 August 28, 2012 at 10:09 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  Women and Nature KichigaiNeko 18 7219 August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused
  Raw Nature Zen Badger 12 5876 March 28, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)