The no true scotsman argument is simply when someone claims that person(s) X is not a true *insert occupation, religion, etc* for whatever reason.
So for example, "He's not a true Christian, true Christians don't murder".
In your case, you said that if a scientist bowed to supernatural beliefs or religion, they weren't a "full" scientist. The problem with this is that the definition of a scientist does not rely on the persons religious beliefs. Indeed many scientists are very religious and yet discover amazing things. You only have to look at Newton to realise that.
So for example, "He's not a true Christian, true Christians don't murder".
In your case, you said that if a scientist bowed to supernatural beliefs or religion, they weren't a "full" scientist. The problem with this is that the definition of a scientist does not rely on the persons religious beliefs. Indeed many scientists are very religious and yet discover amazing things. You only have to look at Newton to realise that.
