Unanswered questions

[Drich]

The Bible describes homosexual sex as a sinful (if not moreso, considering how it singles it out sometimes) as heterosexual acts done outside the bounds of marriage. As the Bible is merely a fairytale though, sin is a false notion, and it cannot be taken seriously. Homosexuality is just as valid as Heterosexuality, and practicing either act with a consenting partner is not a bad thing if done outside the bonds of any kind of marriage. If you feel any guilt after having sex before marriage, it's because you've been brainwashed to think that an invisible sin token has been put on your heavenly tally, which makes the negative emotion completely unwarranted.

Drich, you like porn as you have admitted. If you feel any guilt for viewing it, then it's only because you have allowed religion to affect you in such a way. Would a loving god really want to incite fear in you, or would he treat you with respect and openness? I know you would pick the latter, but that god would be just as made-up as the former, so there's really no use believing in either. What's a better way to operate is to trust in your fellow man and work to make this world a better place for all around you. This is a goal we can all agree on, and it can definitely be achieved by secular means (proven fact).

Wow. You have lied to yourself and lied to me recounting the nature of our conversations. I was starting to develop a great respect for you as you seemed to earnestly follow the logic of discussion we were having. Till now. Now it all just fell apart. You have completely invalidated all of your work and effort to this point. You started out arguing what the bible did and did not say. When it was proved to you conclusively (a dozen different times mind you, something all of your peers got after one or two explainations) that the bible identified all sex out of we'd lock a sin, including gay sex.. You took the intellectually dishonest road and moved to dismiss the whole bible (the very same bible you were desperately trying to use to prove me wrong mind you) just like you did in your first post to me. Remember? I said you summed up the body of your work in your final paragraph of your first post in the series of post. You say basically the same thing as you did here. And I said this was a reaffirming statement you were using to remind yourself that even if you are proven wrong here, you did not believe in any of this stuff anyway.. And what did you say? "Your reading too much into what I said."

Now the circle is complete, and at the end you had to remind yourself as I pointed out you did not believe in any of this anyway.... The point? Your not the unique snow flake you think yourself to be. You fit a stereotype to a fault. I thought you were one of the few who would break the rule, but it seems you value what you been taught to think over learning to think for yourself. As such I have to shake the dust from my feet and move on to others for a while. (It's not you, it's me.)

---

I guess it depends on the man. Can he love without expressing or wanting to express his love sexually?

That is ironically rich, especially coming from a religion that claims one must unite with another merely for the purpose of copulation for the sake of reproduction.

Making babies is rather sexual.

What are you talking about?

Paul tells us we should only get married if we burn with uncontrollable passion...