Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?

[discipulus]

Here, something Ravi Zacharias said is so pertinent...

A man rejects God neither because of intellectual demands nor because of the scarcity of evidence. A man rejects God because of a moral resistance that refuses to admit his need for God.

I see that Ravi is keen on resorting to conjecture.

I can do the same thing.

A man accepts God neither because of intellectual demands nor because of an abundance of evidence. A man accepts God because of a lack of an innate moral compass that drives him to concede his need for God.

The innate moral compass that tells us something is wrong if it is not conducive to the survival of our species and that something is right if it does aid in the survival of our species?

That moral compass? The moral compass that ultimately demonstrates morality is illusory? The moral compass that allows for someone to call someone else's views bullsh** just because you disagree with them?

You think you are acting morally when you do such things?