RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 25, 2013 at 1:09 pm
(This post was last modified: August 25, 2013 at 1:11 pm by pineapplebunnybounce.)
(August 25, 2013 at 12:57 pm)Theo Zacharias Wrote:(August 25, 2013 at 12:50 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: What I said just 2 posts ago: No, I'm not backing away from that part. It must generate evidence, whether or not our technology is advanced enough to detect this evidence, it must generate evidence.
Where did i ignore your question? And you're the one being dishonest here.
My question is clear:
"If there is a natural alien beings with technology far more advanced than what we have now (say million years more advance), if they want to, do you agree that they can affect our world without leaving any evidence that can be detected by our current technology"
If you agree, then you should also agree that God can affect our world without leaving any evidence that can be detected by our current technology.
In conclusion, the fact that we don't detect any affect from God with our technology so far, is *not* an evidence that God does not exist or that God does not affect our world at all.
This is the main topic we're discussing. Don't avoid the main topic by using misinterpretation excuse.
Ok, let's get a few things straight.
Theoretically, can god impact the world leaving evidences that we cannot currently detect? Yes.
However, the result of his interference to remain undetected? Really? If this is the position you want to hold then god doesn't significantly impact much, right? If it cannot be detected. Yea it's possible (not probable, but almost everything is possible).
Btw, the lack of evidence right now is evidence that god isn't interfering in ways that we can detect. That covers quite a lot of ground, even if it doesn't cover all.
