RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 11:35 am
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2013 at 11:36 am by CleanShavenJesus.)
(August 26, 2013 at 2:06 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote:(August 26, 2013 at 1:08 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: If you cannot accept that the universe just is, then you also cannot accept that God just is without reasonably stating that there must be a reason behind His creation.
1) The universe exists and has an explanation for it's existence and the explanation for it's existence is an eternal non-physical source outside of time and space which is Creator of time and space.
2) Universe is...well it just exists without any explanation at all.
Any explanation for something makes far far far more sense than literally no explanation at all.
I know this is now 20 pages back, but you didn't even offer a counterpoint. You just rephrased what you already said. His point is still valid. You could take out the word "universe" in your post and replace it with "God"!
Sword of Christ Wrote:If you were to come up with a decent argument rather than just give short sentences that state your own opinion you can. I'm not interested in opinions I'm interested in good arguments and objections presented in a half civilized manner. A very good argument in favour of a naturalist/coincidental origin of humanity and the universe could possibly win me over, but there hasn't been anything so far.
I've read every page of this thread and every point you've brought up has been debunked, proven incorrect, slashed, destroyed, burned, turned into compost....you get the point. If you disagree with that, then bring up an instance in this thread where your point remained valid. In this very post I already brought up an argument of yours that failed.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
![[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FYAAgdMk.gif)