(September 1, 2013 at 8:06 am)Texas Sailor Wrote:I'm not american, so I don't fully get that "confederate" reference!(August 29, 2013 at 5:57 pm)pocaracas Wrote: If we lived in a world where something like 80% of the population were racist, then I guess... yes!I think you should reconsider this statement and think if such a thing was in fact true at some point in time without the term Aracist being needed to change it. As for the baggage? Do you think it would have carried negative baggage when wandering through confederate states, telling people you were an Aracist? I think you're set on arguing this point with me, but not really getting the gist of the message.
Is it just a fully racist state? One where everyone is racist... the few people who aren't could be called aracist... but it seems those were just called "nigger lovers", or something like that...
