Unanswered questions

[Drich]

You should just leave evolution alone, Drich.

Apparently he has. He seems to know nothing about it.

I know if the sun was the only source of energy that allows for photosynthesis for all naturally occouring plant life on earth, then it stands to reason that all life dependant on this process will taylor itself to estrapolate as much nourshiment from the the avaiable sunlight as possiable. (IF the theory of evolution is correct) However As some plant life stand, it turns out that different combinations of uv exposure will have a greater growth potential on these plants and even coral than natural sunlight.
Which demonstrates that these plants and even animals grow more agressivly in these altered or artificaly enhanced sun light conditions. which would further indicate that these plants/animals were not orginally designed for sun light, Or these plants and animals are not indiginous to this planet's sun. (which ever you perfer, if your still insistant on the model of evolution as it currently stands.)

Not being able to process the current sun light at full capasity is like saying that some horses and cows have never developed the flat moller type teeth they all currently share for grazing. That some only have sharp teeth like a dog or lion, but still feed on grass or grains. again if the animal did not evolve the ablity to process it's primary food source then one can extrapolate that it has either been designed to present this way or that, that particular animal is not indiginous to nor or well suited to life on this planet.

---

Still waiting for a response to my earlier question, hilarious in light of the thread title, and add this one to the pile:

Did you know that certain plants and certain coral grow better under certain blends of artifical light than they do in the sun? How is that possiable if they all 'evolved' with the sun as their only source of light?

Did you know that carbon monoxide, lethal to humans, binds better to haemoglobin than does oxygen which of course is vital to aerobic life? Why should that be possible if we are the special creations of a god?

sorry misread..

Carbon Monoxcide contains Oxygen. If Oxygen's adhearance to haemoglobin is 10, and Carbon's ablity to attach itself to Haemoglobin is 1.5 the total ablity of a CO molicule to attach itself to Haemoglobin is 1.5 greater than Oxygen's ablity to attach itself to Haemoglobin on it's own. Carbon monocide is a combination of two seperate elements that share the properties of each indivisual element. While oxygen is a single element working on it's own.

Where does your arguement fail?

It fails because you presuppose that the world was built so that it may completely and perfectly support us. when in fact that was the purpose of the garden. Once we left the garden we were taken out of a friendly enviroment and made to survive in this one. We are not built to last here. This life is not our reward.