Unanswered questions

[Drich]

So Drich, do you still hold that the order of creation as presented in Genesis is correct, or do you concede that there's no way to justify the findings of the cosmos with a story that's outdated due to perceptual errors?

I hold to my orginal assertion.

The creation account in Genesis is given from a Garden view perspective. Meaning if you were sat in the middle of the Garden these are the things you would see in the order you would see them.

Kinda like how the book of revelations was written. God did the same thing there. He took John of patmos and place Him in the middle of the action and John wrote down in his own words what he saw in the order he saw it happen.

---

What I've demonstrated is that you do not understand the arguement and have gone off on a non sepuitur searching for a dual purpose chlorophyll

No, what you've demonstrated is your lack of understanding of mutations and the passing of those through genes. My point was that a mutation can be "selected" by evolution that has benefits in one manner(green color) but produces other side benefits(the ability to absorb more light than it needs), which disproves your claim that if evolution were true, a plant would be unable to evolve to a point where it could absorb more energy than it can receive from the sun.

It's been fun playing, though.

logical Fallacy/ad nausium.