(September 11, 2013 at 11:44 am)John V Wrote:Debatable(September 11, 2013 at 11:29 am)pocaracas Wrote: Indeed we don't know...Off the top of my head:
So why accept any of them at all?
In general:
- the first cause argument
(September 11, 2013 at 11:44 am)John V Wrote: - the argument from designDebatable
(September 11, 2013 at 11:44 am)John V Wrote: - evolutionary considerations - i.e., even if none are true, they seem to have value to humansAgreed
- hope and comfort
(September 11, 2013 at 11:44 am)John V Wrote: Regarding Christianity:Some of those messengers do seem like fictional characters, don't they?
- for the NT at least we have better information regarding the messengers. Absent an a priori rejection of god, the messengers seem sincere, sane, and lacking self-interest. That's not enough to necessitate belief, but it's more than many other religions can say.
(September 11, 2013 at 11:44 am)John V Wrote: - the Bible's take on mankind agrees with my observations of myself and others.I'd wager that most religions have a take on mankind that agrees with the way people are... could it be that they all looked at how people are and then wrote it down?