(January 16, 2010 at 11:46 am)tackattack Wrote: Not all, but most religious interpretation is subjective.....This defies all logic. You first said you had no clue if your interpretation was right or not, or words along that line ("I don't have a right interpretation, just my interpretation..."). Now you say you can distinguish between subjective interpretation and objective interpretation. Does not compute! Non sequitur. Does not follow.
(January 16, 2010 at 11:46 am)tackattack Wrote: ...and changes to include more people, detrimentally to their beliefs. I've tried and researched many different variations within and outside of Christianity, to include none.So you have found no of the shelf interpretation that you liked on the basis of your self-invented criterion, but you can distinguish between subjective interpretation and objective interpretations. That's neat, how do you do that?
I judge other interpretations based off of the level of fufillment gained from actively participating in understanding the universal truths presented using the tools above. It's not to say I have all the answers because I do not. However seeking definition of immaterial truths advances my ability to reason my reality.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0